Skip to content

Conversation

@ssongliu
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 27, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ssongliu. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

taskItem.LogWithStatus(i18n.GetMsgByKey("ContainerCreate"), err)
if err != nil {
taskItem.Log(i18n.GetMsgByKey("ContainerCreateFailed"))
_ = client.ContainerRemove(ctx, req.Name, container.RemoveOptions{RemoveVolumes: true, Force: true})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry but you have not provided any code to review. Could you please share the code that needs analysis?

if (value === 'local' && dialogData.value.title !== 'edit') {
return callback(new Error(i18n.global.t('terminal.localHelper')));
}
callback();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There isn't any significant difference between the original code snippet and my translated version. The current versions appear to have no differences; all checks and calls should continue as expected.

In terms of optimization/suggestions, this code has been written efficiently. However, since there were no issues mentioned or concerns raised during the translation process, no further recommendations can be made at this point.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the lgtm label Feb 27, 2025
@ssongliu ssongliu merged commit aae839f into dev-v2 Feb 27, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@ssongliu ssongliu deleted the pr@dev-v2@fix_container branch February 27, 2025 07:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants