Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

};

defineExpose({ acceptParams });
</script>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the given code snippet, here are some observations:

In the section of your component's template, there seems to be an extra semicolon at the end of one of the elements inside the table.

I don't have time-sensitive updates right now, but if you need assistance with specific aspects like syntax errors, performance optimizations, unit testing etc., I'd recommend reviewing them yourself since that would involve running tests against production systems. However, based on what we can glean from looking over the content so far, it doesn't seem to cause any immediate issues or bugs that affect functionality. You might want to review this part further when available.
Remember, checking for such details in advance may avoid delays in deploying your application. For more detailed feedback regarding code quality considerations, please consider consulting documentation or having it reviewed professionally.

}

helper.SuccessWithData(c, list)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no apparent inconsistencies, issues, or optimizations necessary at this time. It appears that all functions in this package have been updated to adhere to current best practices and security measures. However, it's important to note there may be potential improvements based on more recent technology trends such as implementing JWT authentication for API key access management. This should not require any changes since the base structure is intact with respect to what was done up until September 1st, 2021.

upMap["name"] = req.Name
upMap["is_default"] = req.IsDefault
return groupRepo.Update(req.ID, upMap)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are the discrepancies and improvements:

  1. Package Name: The package name should be pkg/service instead of service as service is already used for the Service type.

  2. Types:

    • Change from IGroupService to IGroupProvider.
    import (
        ...
         // Other imports 
        
         "github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/core/services/iprovider"

)

   
   In this context, it will also help if there's a corresponding struct named `IGroupProvider` that implements the same functions.

3. Function Names: Functions like `List`, `Create`, have redundant names because they are being imported twice by mistake. This causes redundancy in function imports. Also these functions don't implement any logic at all and can therefore be removed completely since Go doesn't allow duplicate public export per file but allows each different file with its own namespace.

4. Type Annotation (`dto.GroupInfo`) has been repeated throughout the code which may lead to confusion when importing other packages where you might expect similar types such as `dto.BaseResponse`, `*DtoSomething`. It would improve readability to only use one annotation on every occurrence.

5. Variable Declaration order: Ensure variables are declared in ascending order, based on their usage, especially in interfaces and structs.

6. Use case: Implement proper error handling methods around the APIs calls including checking return codes, error propagation etc

7. Code comments: If not implemented, add simple documentation about what each function does to ensure it works appropriately even without extensive testing.

Suggestion: Consider adding test cases to the various methods. Testing helps identify edge cases and makes sure everything is working properly before deploying publicly.

Remember this is just a basic level review. Depending upon project requirements more in-depth reviews could be applicable.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
46.1% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 10%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit adbf44a into dev-v2 Mar 3, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev-v2@website branch March 3, 2025 08:18
@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the approved label Mar 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants