Skip to content

Conversation

@ssongliu
Copy link
Member

@ssongliu ssongliu commented Mar 3, 2025

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ssongliu. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

return launcherRepo.SyncAll(launchers)
}

func (u *DashboardService) LoadOsInfo() (*dto.OsInfo, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet is from a C# library for managing panels on an open-source software platform called 1Panel. There are a few points to note:

  1. The sync functions do not take arguments, which is not consistent with their current implementation.
  2. In the sync function implementations, there's too much duplicated code for creating models and saving them in different cases of operations like creation, update, delete. It would be beneficial to refactor this logic into smaller, more concise functions.

Here are some suggestions:
a. Refactor:

  • Simplify the loadOsInfo() function by extracting common functionality (e.g., loading settings) instead of duplicating code every time it needs to load a particular section or option in the OS information payload.

b. Functionality Improvements:

  • Clean up repetitive calls within each individual function.
  • Add comments where necessary to clarify what each function does without using a lot of text.
  • Ensure that all functions return appropriate errors if anything unexpected occurs.

c. Testing and Quality Assurance:

  • Implement unit tests for critical sections of your code to ensure correct behavior under various scenarios.
  • Conduct comprehensive integration testing across multiple platforms, environments, and applications before deploying.

d. Documentation:

  • Create detailed docstrings for both public API methods (like the Sync() method) and private helper functions. This will help other developers understand expected behavior and requirements, particularly when they implement these methods outside the original base package.

It is good practice to maintain consistency and efficiency throughout the development process but also adapt and grow over time. Good luck!

itemData, _ := json.Marshal(launchers)
_, _ = req_helper.NewLocalClient("/api/v2/dashboard/app/launcher/sync", http.MethodPost, bytes.NewReader((itemData)))
_ = xpack.RequestToAllAgent("/api/v2/dashboard/app/launcher/sync", http.MethodPost, bytes.NewReader((itemData)))
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The key difference between the two codes is that one uses req.Value which should be an enum of status, while the other does not use it at all. This causes some unexpected behavior if we try to set launch state using the wrong value (constant.StatusDisable instead of constant.StatusEnable). There's also a missing line return fmt.Errorf("Unsupported operation %s for agent '%v'.", operation, req) to handle unsupported operation.

This can cause issues with agents responding to requests incorrectly depending on what they actually support since different enums may correspond to differing statuses like 'create' vs 'delete'.

Optimization suggestion:

  • Instead of using req.Value, define an enum for easier management of launcher states (e.g., const.Enable etc.). Also remove unused lines related to this field.

For example:

if req.Value == constant.StatusEnable && launcher.ID != 0 {
	if err := launcherRepo.Create(&model.AppLauncher{Key: req.Key});
	else { // Add more logic here based on desired outcome.
		go syncLauncherToAgent(launcher, "update"); // or any other appropriate function for update operations
		return nil
	}
} else if req.Value == constant.StatusDisable && launcher.ID != 0 {
	// Code for disabling launcher goes here
} else { // Handle cases where value is invalid
	return fmt.Errorf("Unsupported operation %q for agent '%s'.", req.Value.String(), launcherKey)
}

}
if file.IsDir() {
size, err := fileOp.GetDirSize(path.Join(pathItem, file.Name()))
if err != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code appears to be well written but not extensive enough for detailed analysis of regularity, potential issues, or optimization. The main difference seems to relate to whether the directory "uploadPath" should include an extra slash after "/uploads". It might be helpful if more context is provided for proper review.

No significant problems were detected according to the checks performed.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the lgtm label Mar 3, 2025
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit 4cfc343 into dev-v2 Mar 3, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev-v2@fix_terminal branch March 3, 2025 09:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants