Conversation
COPYING file is no essential and better is to leave it in source tree allowing packagers decide what to do with that file. Remove of that file suggested in latchset#116 Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@github.com>
|
I am not sure this does not break GPL. For example, when distributing JOSE rpm package, the rpm has the COPYING file included: $ rpm -ql jose-11-8.fc39.x86_64.rpm
...
/usr/share/licenses/jose
/usr/share/licenses/jose/COPYING
... |
I did not wrote anything about breaking something. License: MIT (https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html) |
|
Sorry, I meant Apache license. According to it (https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0): So, IMHO, this PR should not be merged and COPYING file should be distributed |
|
As a pure aside: https://mesonbuild.com/Release-notes-for-1-1-0.html#the-project-function-now-supports-setting-the-project-license-files If you bumped your minimum version of meson to 1.1.0, then you could set the license file in the |
Hello @eli-schwartz : Thanks for clarifying. I guess this should be tracked in a new issue. |
COPYING file is no essential and better is to leave it in source tree allowing packagers decide what to do with that file.
Remove of that file suggested in #116