Skip to content

Conversation

@openstack-k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openstack-k8s-ci-robot openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 10, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 v2.27.4v2.27.5 age confidence

Release Notes

onsi/ginkgo (github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2)

v2.27.5

Compare Source

2.27.5
Fixes

Don't make a new formatter for each GinkgoT(); that's just silly and uses precious memory


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone America/New_York, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abays and rabi January 10, 2026 05:53
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/6463886f017a4b52a1feeef7bcd05cca

openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider FAILURE in 7m 53s
⚠️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider
⚠️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider
⚠️ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider
⚠️ openstack-operator-tempest-multinode SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider

@openstack-k8s-ci-robot openstack-k8s-ci-robot changed the title fix(deps): update module github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 to v2.27.4 fix(deps): update module github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 to v2.27.4 - autoclosed Jan 10, 2026
@openstack-k8s-ci-robot openstack-k8s-ci-robot deleted the renovate/github.com-onsi-ginkgo-v2-2.x branch January 10, 2026 17:15
@openstack-k8s-ci-robot openstack-k8s-ci-robot changed the title fix(deps): update module github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 to v2.27.4 - autoclosed fix(deps): update module github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 to v2.27.5 Jan 17, 2026
@openstack-k8s-ci-robot openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-onsi-ginkgo-v2-2.x branch 2 times, most recently from 776a51f to 85367de Compare January 17, 2026 06:11
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openstack-k8s-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2026

@openstack-k8s-ci-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl-4-18 85367de link unknown /test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl-4-18
ci/prow/openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl 85367de link unknown /test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants