Skip to content

Conversation

@adqm
Copy link
Contributor

@adqm adqm commented Dec 21, 2025

This PR is an implementation of PEP 798 (Unpacking in Comprehensions), reflecting the SC's required modification to genexp semantics from the original proposal.

Feedback is welcome! :)


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--143056.org.readthedocs.build/

Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! A few nitpicky comments, I didn't read past Lib/test yet.

Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The C code all looks good. I'll run it through the buildbots to make sure though.

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Dec 22, 2025
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @JelleZijlstra for commit 81e86b3 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F143056%2Fmerge

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Dec 22, 2025
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm assuming the plan is to document this in 3.15 "What's New" later?

@adqm
Copy link
Contributor Author

adqm commented Dec 23, 2025

@ZeroIntensity Thanks for the review!

I'm assuming the plan is to document this in 3.15 "What's New" later?

I haven't drafted a blurb for "What's New" yet, but I'm happy to do so. I can do that in a separate PR later, or I don't mind adding it to this one if that's better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants