Skip to content

Conversation

@0hmX
Copy link
Contributor

@0hmX 0hmX commented Dec 25, 2025

Because we were making new nodes only, it made super small nodes, which led to a lot of jank. This will not remove all of them but reduce them and is a behavior we want!

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 25, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
rectdiff Ready Ready Preview, Comment Dec 25, 2025 9:07pm

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

start,
end,
z: primaryEdge.z,
isBroken: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont understand what this means

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I renamed it to isSegmentSameLengthAsParentEdge

@seveibar
Copy link
Contributor

Can you help me understand what this is doing? I looked at the snapshot- i dont understand

@0hmX
Copy link
Contributor Author

0hmX commented Dec 25, 2025

Untitled-2025-09-09-2322

@0hmX
Copy link
Contributor Author

0hmX commented Dec 25, 2025

I added a commit before this so that we can see the difference clearly in the snapshot
But it's hard to see in the snapshot, You have to zoom in!

Untitled-2025-09-09-2322(1)

Copy link
Contributor

@seveibar seveibar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the gap fill stage shouldn't expand nodes, that is doing too much. If we are able to expand an edge it should be done in a prior stage

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants